Search for: All records

Abstract Bats provide vital ecosystem services, including pest suppression and crop pollination. However, the increasing proximity of bats and humans is a growing conservation and public health concern with negative consequences for both sides. Mitigating these consequences requires integrative approaches like network science and the emerging field of social-ecological networks (SENs), which offer powerful tools to map and analyse complex social and ecological dynamics. Here, we synthesize how network approaches have been applied to bat research and conservation. Specifically, we: (i) assess the use of both ecological and social network analyses to study bats; (ii) identify network tools well-suited for SEN-based bat research; (iii) present a case study illustrating how SEN applications in bat research can inform conservation and One Health efforts; and, lastly, (iv) discuss key challenges and opportunities in using SENs to investigate the human-bat interface. Our review unveils a rise in network-based bat research from 2006 to 2020, followed by a post-pandemic decline. Nevertheless, across the 127 studies mapped by our review, only one applied an SEN lens. Finally, we suggest how applying some underexplored SEN tools to bat research could lead to novel perspectives, aiming to promote integrated strategies for the coexistence of bats and humans. 

Global biodiversity and ecosystem function are the result of complex networks of interactions and feedbacks between animals and their environments, which in turn are affected by the interactions and feedbacks between animals and the organisms they host. Understanding these complex networks, including the main drivers of and responses to ecological and environmental changes and their global implications, requires adopting a systems-based perspective. We advocate for this approach by characterizing a framework centered around bats, a globally-distributed mammalian order, and their dual roles as both inhabitants of ecosystems and as habitats themselves. Like other organisms, bats interact with habitats by providing ecosystem services that impact the survival and distribution of other species, and may be affected by such factors as land use change, climate change, fluctuations in food availability, and hunting pressure. Habitat conditions (e.g. food availability, temperature, etc.) can affect the physiological condition of individuals, which in turn can affect the prevalence and/or virulence of hosted organisms and potential pathogens (e.g. ectoparasites, bacteria, viruses, fungi, and protozoa). In addition, the interactions among individuals (e.g. co-roosting, migration, etc.) influence the habitat connectivity for their hosted organisms (e.g. opportunities for dispersal). Bats have a unique relationship with infectious disease, both biological and cultural. With this in mind, when applied to bats this framework has special importance to how we understand and apply the One Health concept, whereby healthy natural environments foster both human and animal health, which in turn also promotes healthy environments. By leveraging a hierarchical approach among these different levels of biological organization, we can arrive at a clearer picture of the specific threats facing bats—as well as the risk of pathogen spillover to humans and other domesticated and wild animals generated by disrupting this delicate balance—and identify possible measures to mitigate adverse impacts. Thus, to understand these complex interactions and their implications for conservation, ecosystem health, and human health, we need a new ecological framework that recognizes that changes in habitats not only affect macrofauna and the ecosystem services they provide, but also have the potential to cascade through the diversity and evolution of the organisms they host. This review provides a case study for the application of this framework, which is extensible to other organisms with their own unique relationships with habitats and as habitats.